View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jetson Beginner
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 30 Topics: 2 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:38 pm Post subject: Extend allocation.. |
|
|
I have a dataset currently storing 17k tracks, 100% utilized. What is the best way to add more data to the file?
Our system removes ALL unused tracks/cylinders every evening, so I can't allocate more than I need and expect it to be there the next day.
Somehow, I'll have to temporarily store the data, delete the production file, and then rebuild it with the additional data - I think!
BTW - this is a SAS job, and the dataset is a SAS library.
Kenny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kolusu Site Admin

Joined: 26 Nov 2002 Posts: 12378 Topics: 75 Location: San Jose
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
BTW - this is a SAS job, and the dataset is a SAS library.
|
Is it a PDS?
Kolusu _________________ Kolusu
www.linkedin.com/in/kolusu |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jetson Beginner
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 30 Topics: 2 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, but it's capable of storing multiple SAS objects, hence the library reference. Here's a typical allocation:
//OUT1 DD DSN=HIGHLVL.SASFILE.MYLIB,
// DISP=(,CATLG,DELETE),
// DCB=(LRECL=27648,RECFM=FS,DSORG=PS),
// UNIT=TSODA,SPACE=(TRK,(1900,190),RLSE) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mervyn Moderator

Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Posts: 415 Topics: 6 Location: Hove, England
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:34 pm Post subject: Re: Extend allocation.. |
|
|
jetson wrote: | Our system removes ALL unused tracks/cylinders every evening, so I can't allocate more than I need and expect it to be there the next day. |
It simply must be possible to make an exception for a file like this.
Have you spoken to your Storage guys? _________________ The day you stop learning the dinosaur becomes extinct |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jetson Beginner
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 30 Topics: 2 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, not really. I think the problem lies with the fact that I'm using public packs instead of private, which have a higher cost. You make a good poin though. I'll call one of my storage buddies and see if he can comment.
Yeah, I should have stated that private packs are not tampered with as far as removing unused space - makes sense actually.
Maybe this is the direction I need to go.
Kenny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|