View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
AKRISHNA Beginner

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 10 Topics: 2 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:36 pm Post subject: Security for Sequential Files? |
|
|
Hi All,
How can I secure a sequential file that I create, so that no other id can delete or overwrite it? Is it possible somehow? If someone runs a JCL with my file's DISP set to OLD and DELETE, all my data is gone!
Regards,
AK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
warp5 Intermediate

Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Posts: 429 Topics: 18 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2003 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is a RACF issue or other security tool. Check with your RACF specialist. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
prakal Beginner
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 22 Topics: 1
|
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2003 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
You could try creating a PS with your userid as the first qualifier to protect datasets. But again this can be overridden by using security tools like RACF etc.
Prakal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AKRISHNA Beginner

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 10 Topics: 2 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2003 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Prakal and Warp5. I work on ROSCOE and not TSO. And the convention at our site is to have the VOL SER name as the first qualifier.
Thanks anyways, let me try these out.
Regards,
AK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CaptBill Beginner
Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Posts: 100 Topics: 2 Location: Pasadena, California, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It does not matter that you use ROSCOE over TSO. RACF is a security tool.
Do you have a security product at your shop? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AKRISHNA Beginner

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 10 Topics: 2 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi CaptBill,
We do have RACF on our machine, but the pblm is that I work on our client's machine and I want to explore all the programmers' options before I go to the admin for some RACF relate help.
I cant have PS file names starting with my id prefix as it is against the naming standards!
Regards,
AK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
slade Intermediate
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 266 Topics: 1 Location: Edison, NJ USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi AK,
With the warning that "reserving" resources for your sole use can get you into trouble with TPTB, you could try using a reasonable RETPD in your JCL when creating the file. It doesn't protect the file from overwriting but it does protect it from deletion.
But remember that the space or tape cannot be deleted by anyone until the retention period expires. If you abuse the feature you could become famous real quick.
Regards, Jack. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AKRISHNA Beginner

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 10 Topics: 2 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Slade,
Thanks for this input. However, I dont think I can try this, especially on my clients machine!
Thanks anyways,
AK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
slade Intermediate
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 266 Topics: 1 Location: Edison, NJ USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi AK,
I'm afraid that if you're unable or unwilling to speak to the security admin about getting a password, you're doomed to roam the earth unprotected.
Regards, Jack. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
taltyman JCL Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Posts: 310 Topics: 8 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
volser the 1st qualifier????? Did they have a reason for that? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AKRISHNA Beginner

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 10 Topics: 2 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Taltyman,
It is just a convention here to have the VOLSER name as the first qualifier.
Rgds,
AK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
taltyman JCL Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Posts: 310 Topics: 8 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
The storage guys must really have fun when dasd gets replaced. In effect this convention makes the datasets named that way are unmovable and if they do get moved then the convention is invalid for that dataset or datasets. The system can find the dataset using the catalog without the need for a volser anywhere in the dataset name. I realize you can't do anything about this but that is one of the dumbest conventions I have ever heard of. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|